You are viewing an archive of Victory Road.
Victory Road closed on January 8, 2018. Thank you for making us a part of your lives since 2006! Please read this thread for details if you missed it.
This is an emergency.
The government is planning on doing something to stop piracy and illegal downloads.
And by doing that, they will be taking away ALL OF YOUR INTERNET PRIVACY.
They will watch everything you download, EVERYTHING
They will make sure nothing is against the "Government Policy"
They will document EVERYTHING you do online. You will have no privacy at all
This is very urgent and wrong. To help stop this, PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
Post a DeviantART journal, a news article, put it on facebook, myspace, twitter, youtube, and any other website you use.
WE MUST STOP THIS. WE MUST HAVE PRIVACY!
UPDATE:
This is ACTA who is going to stop piracy, WHICH ISN'T A BAD DEAL BUT HERES THE CATCH.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT PIRACY.
THIS IS ABOUT PRIVACY.
Everyone on a computer will be monitored of their progress. No more privacy at all for anybody. NOPE.
- ISPS will now watch what you download, and tattle on you if you download a music track/ any data / rapidshares / torrents etc.
- ISPS will tattle on you, when you do anything which goes against "Governments policy".
- ISPS will be able to document and store EVERYTHING you do online. nothing will ever be private again
--
Potential border searches are covered by the "Border Measures" proposal of ACTA. As of February 2009 and according to University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist there is significant disagreement among countries on this topic: "Some countries are seeking the minimum rules, the removal of certain clauses, and a specific provision to put to rest fears of iPod searching customs officials by excluding personal baggage that contains goods of a non-commercial nature. The U.S. is pushing for broad provisions that cover import, export, and in-transit shipments."[42] Newspaper reported that the draft agreement would empower security officials at airports and other international borders to conduct random ex officio searches of laptops, MP3 players, and cellular phones for illegally downloaded or "ripped" music and movies. Travellers with infringing content would be subject to a fine and may have their devices confiscated or destroyed.
--
"Canadian officials travel to Guadalajara, Mexico this week to resume negotiations on the still-secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The discussion is likely to turn to the prospect of supporting three strikes and you’re out systems that could result in thousands of people losing access to the Internet based on three allegations of copyright infringement. Leaked ACTA documents indicate that encouraging the adoption of three-strikes - often euphemistically described as “graduated response” for the way Internet providers gradually send increasingly threatening warnings to subscribers - has been proposed for possible inclusion in the treaty."
--
No. I know nobody is going to want this.
So what can you do?
You can start by spreading the word. This isn't some chain mail, this is serious.
They're going to monitor EVERYONE AND THEIR PRIVACY WILL BE GONE. And I don't want to log into my computer and see that someone is watching me.
UPDATE:
From This Page:
|
Originally Posted by Anti ACTA Webpage
"ACTA is an abbreviation for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. It is an International Treaty that will be pushed to implementation by 2010. It has been discussed in secret since October 2007, and has been leaked by government officials who were against the unconstitutional, ineffective, inhumane, and unlawful nature of such a treaty.
Countries affected by this treaty include but are not limited to: Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, The Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States The official goal of the agreement is the international enforcement of strong intellectual property rights. Some of our concerns include the vague, amorphous manner in which “counterfeit” is used in many of the public comments. These uses run the gamut from undisputedly illegal products to expressly legitimate generic products. We believe that ACTA holds the potential to restrict innovation, consumer choice and freedom on the Internet by it's many restrictions and its changes to the legal front on copyrights. The scope of ACTA includes counterfeit goods, generic medicines, Internet censorship, irrational new downloading laws and what is termed "piracy over the Internet". ACTA is a treaty, which would overcome many court precedents in your own country that defines consumer rights as to "fair use" and would remove any limitations on the application of intellectual property laws. This means that ACTA would overrule any laws in your own country, and deal harsher, unfair and ineffective punishment to anyone suspected of piracy, without a trial in court. If you are just suspected of listening to songs illegally, or uploading anything illegal, you may be dealt with harshly, against the laws of your own country. ACTA also makes Internet Service Providers legally responsible for any of it's users downloaded content. ACTA gives recording industries more rights to enforce copyrights and officers of the law the right to search any digital device for copyrighted material. Did you pay for the songs on your iPod?" (if you paid for the songs but ripped them from a CD you bought and put them on your ipod it would be illegal) "Under the new law, that instantly classifies you as a criminal, and the same classification as murderers and rapists. You will get a criminal record. Even if you do not download songs onto your iPod, you will feel the effects as millions, possibly billions of dollars in taxpayer's money will be poured in to catch these "criminals", money that can be used to save lives. Part of ACTA deems anyone accused of copyright infringement to "compensate" for the loss in profit to recording companies. They want harsher punishments for these criminals. These recording companies, such as UMG, earn upwards of $1 billion in 2009. However, the RIAA (Recording Industries Association of America) recently sued a 12 year old girl for downloading, as well as many other people. They are seeking $150 000 per song, on allofmp3.com[1]. How much harsher will they go? Isn't there a point where they must stop?" |
UPDATE:
This is ACTA who is going to stop piracy, WHICH ISN'T A BAD DEAL BUT HERES THE CATCH.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT PIRACY.
THIS IS ABOUT PRIVACY.
Everyone on a computer will be monitored of their progress. No more privacy at all for anybody. NOPE.
- ISPS will now watch what you download, and tattle on you if you download a music track/ any data / rapidshares / torrents etc.
- ISPS will tattle on you, when you do anything which goes against "Governments policy".
- ISPS will be able to document and store EVERYTHING you do online. nothing will ever be private again
--
Potential border searches are covered by the "Border Measures" proposal of ACTA. As of February 2009 and according to University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist there is significant disagreement among countries on this topic: "Some countries are seeking the minimum rules, the removal of certain clauses, and a specific provision to put to rest fears of iPod searching customs officials by excluding personal baggage that contains goods of a non-commercial nature. The U.S. is pushing for broad provisions that cover import, export, and in-transit shipments."[42] Newspaper reported that the draft agreement would empower security officials at airports and other international borders to conduct random ex officio searches of laptops, MP3 players, and cellular phones for illegally downloaded or "ripped" music and movies. Travellers with infringing content would be subject to a fine and may have their devices confiscated or destroyed.
--
"Canadian officials travel to Guadalajara, Mexico this week to resume negotiations on the still-secret Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The discussion is likely to turn to the prospect of supporting three strikes and you’re out systems that could result in thousands of people losing access to the Internet based on three allegations of copyright infringement. Leaked ACTA documents indicate that encouraging the adoption of three-strikes - often euphemistically described as “graduated response” for the way Internet providers gradually send increasingly threatening warnings to subscribers - has been proposed for possible inclusion in the treaty."
--
No. I know nobody is going to want this.
So what can you do?
You can start by spreading the word. This isn't some chain mail, this is serious.
They're going to monitor EVERYONE AND THEIR PRIVACY WILL BE GONE. And I don't want to log into my computer and see that someone is watching me.
Hang on a a second... we're NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO BREAK THE LAW ANYMORE?! How unjust! :O
Oh, and if you are somehow worried about privacy being broken, the government does not care what websites ONE teenager goes to when they have the entire United States on document. The Government also wont' change something based on chain mail, either.
Sigh... To set the record straight, this is untrue and mostly lies. ArsTechnica has several stories that provide a good background on this with good continuing coverage.
The U.S. has no interest on spying on you. They have never spied on you unless there was a real reason to: are you a terrorist? The WIPO Treaties, Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, and others are for, and only for, the interest of copyright holders, most notably the RIAA. While I personally feel these are wrong, they are for the malicious monetary gain of the RIAA and similar parties, not in any way for that of the United States.
Three Strikes Laws/Graduated Response has been employed in countries like France, and more notably the EU (I'm not as current on the topic there, though), but no bill has even been proposed to initiate a graduated response policy in the U.S., and though the copyright holders may want it, the U.S. "Copyright Czar" has made clear no policy will ever exist.
The Bottom Line: A three strikes law will not be initiated anytime soon in the U.S., and The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) does not employ it.
|
Sigh... To set the record straight, this is untrue and mostly lies. ArsTechnica has several stories that provide a good background on this with good continuing coverage.
The U.S. has no interest on spying on you. They have never spied on you unless there was a real reason to: are you a terrorist? The WIPO Treaties, Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, and others are for, and only for, the interest of copyright holders, most notably the RIAA. While I personally feel these are wrong, they are for the malicious monetary gain of the RIAA and similar parties, not in any way for that of the United States. Three Strikes Laws/Graduated Response has been employed in countries like France, and more notably the EU (I'm not as current on the topic there, though), but no bill has even been proposed to initiate a graduated response policy in the U.S., and though the copyright holders may want it, the U.S. "Copyright Czar" has made clear no policy will ever exist. The Bottom Line: A three strikes law will not be initiated anytime soon in the U.S., and The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) does not employ it. |
People standing behind you is also a risk 
This is, of course, true of IE's and Firefox's porn modes as well. The only truly secure way is with SSH (https://)... Ironically 7-chan employs this.
UPDATE:
From This Page:
|
Originally Posted by Anti ACTA Webpage
"ACTA is an abbreviation for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. It is an International Treaty that will be pushed to implementation by 2010. It has been discussed in secret since October 2007, and has been leaked by government officials who were against the unconstitutional, ineffective, inhumane, and unlawful nature of such a treaty.
Countries affected by this treaty include but are not limited to: Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, The Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States The official goal of the agreement is the international enforcement of strong intellectual property rights. Some of our concerns include the vague, amorphous manner in which “counterfeit” is used in many of the public comments. These uses run the gamut from undisputedly illegal products to expressly legitimate generic products. We believe that ACTA holds the potential to restrict innovation, consumer choice and freedom on the Internet by it's many restrictions and its changes to the legal front on copyrights. The scope of ACTA includes counterfeit goods, generic medicines, Internet censorship, irrational new downloading laws and what is termed "piracy over the Internet". ACTA is a treaty, which would overcome many court precedents in your own country that defines consumer rights as to "fair use" and would remove any limitations on the application of intellectual property laws. This means that ACTA would overrule any laws in your own country, and deal harsher, unfair and ineffective punishment to anyone suspected of piracy, without a trial in court. If you are just suspected of listening to songs illegally, or uploading anything illegal, you may be dealt with harshly, against the laws of your own country. ACTA also makes Internet Service Providers legally responsible for any of it's users downloaded content. ACTA gives recording industries more rights to enforce copyrights and officers of the law the right to search any digital device for copyrighted material. Did you pay for the songs on your iPod?" (if you paid for the songs but ripped them from a CD you bought and put them on your ipod it would be illegal) "Under the new law, that instantly classifies you as a criminal, and the same classification as murderers and rapists. You will get a criminal record. Even if you do not download songs onto your iPod, you will feel the effects as millions, possibly billions of dollars in taxpayer's money will be poured in to catch these "criminals", money that can be used to save lives. Part of ACTA deems anyone accused of copyright infringement to "compensate" for the loss in profit to recording companies. They want harsher punishments for these criminals. These recording companies, such as UMG, earn upwards of $1 billion in 2009. However, the RIAA (Recording Industries Association of America) recently sued a 12 year old girl for downloading, as well as many other people. They are seeking $150 000 per song, on allofmp3.com[1]. How much harsher will they go? Isn't there a point where they must stop?" |
I don't see this as a massive problem. For years and years the government has always been watching you. Anything and everything you have done has been within the eyes of the government. You are never truly alone, you never have been. This is just an example of Big Brother, looking down on you watching your every move. Even to the internet, the place you thought you could hide. Then again, they are already tracking what webpages you are viewing. Remember, once it's done, it can never be un-done.