Victory Road Archive

You are viewing an archive of Victory Road.

Victory Road closed on January 8, 2018. Thank you for making us a part of your lives since 2006! Please read this thread for details if you missed it.

Pokémon Black and White → Hey, how about new types?

Page 1 of 212>

1. byt411 said on April 12, 2010, 02:15:28 PM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

Look:Fish,shining and Shadow from XD and Coluseem.

2. Yoshizard said on April 12, 2010, 02:23:18 PM (-07:00)

Haxorus
360 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by byt411 View Post
Look:Fish,shining and Shadow from XD and Coluseem.
Fish? No. Shining? Meh. Shadow. Interesting....

I would like to see Light (as opposed to dark) and also maybe Space, or Galactic, or something.

3. Magmaster12 said on April 12, 2010, 02:43:43 PM (-07:00)

Rayquaza
4,872 posts

NO

They've never changed it for the last 2 Gens it's balanced there is no need for change!

4. SK said on April 12, 2010, 03:03:42 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,238 posts

Lol I wanna see 20 types.. OCD

5. FreezeWarp said on April 12, 2010, 03:07:31 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,186 posts

I've heard of the following ideas, but I hate them all:
-Light
-Plasma
-Wood [ex. Sudowoodo]
-Fish [ex. Magikarp or Goldeen]
-Bird (That was a beta type in Gen-1)
-Space [ex. Clefairy]

They all belong to other types; Light is somewhat unique, as is plasma, but neither have a whole lot of existing Pokémon.

6. Ayunnuya said on April 12, 2010, 04:28:17 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

I kinda agree with Mag. No new types are really necessary.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a nifty new type to hype about.
(Hehe, Lol, type to hype.)

7. SK said on April 12, 2010, 04:35:12 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,238 posts

How about uberepicpwnagelazor type? =D

8. Alakazamaster said on April 12, 2010, 05:00:05 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,366 posts

Bird? Fish? No offense but those are already covered by Water and Flying. I see no need for new types at all. The only readon Dark and Steel were added was because Psychic was so broken in Gen. 1. The types are now balanced, and there is no need for a new one.

9. UltimaRaichu said on April 12, 2010, 08:51:20 PM (-07:00)

Haxorus
369 posts

How about more moves with the ??? type.

10. Shadow said on April 13, 2010, 08:15:07 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,209 posts

I agree with most of the above posters; although it would certainly be interesting to add a new type, there's no real need for it.

11. The Spirit of Time said on April 13, 2010, 08:46:01 AM (-07:00)

Rayquaza
3,934 posts

I strongly disagree, as the types now are well-balanced. They just need to add more fire, steel and dark Pokemon.

12. bunnygirl said on April 13, 2010, 09:51:17 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

I'd like a Light type...
the Space idea is REALLY COOL >;D I've never thought of that,
but I really like that idea

I don't see the problem with more types... especially because they want to really "change" how Pokemon is looked at... adding another (more?) type(s) would be coolio ^_~

13. Jaredvcxz said on April 13, 2010, 12:56:52 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,185 posts

I think that there should be a crystal type. It's a fairly solid idea, since there can be many applications to crystal-type moves.


As for light: It's the perfect way to counter dark-type, but there would need to be a type that can overpower it, which I don't see happening.

14. Yoshizard said on April 13, 2010, 01:04:21 PM (-07:00)

Haxorus
360 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaredvcxz View Post
As for light: It's the perfect way to counter dark-type, but there would need to be a type that can overpower it, which I don't see happening.
This might be strange, but it could work...

How about Light has all of the strengths and weaknesses of Dark, but is super effective against Dark. Dark will also be super-effective against Light.

15. LiteTheIronMan said on April 13, 2010, 04:22:16 PM (-07:00)

Shaymin
2,854 posts

As I've said previously, Light-type should exist if only to counter Sableye and Spiritomb. It would be balanced by being weak to Normal types, especially since Normal moves can't get type trump multipliers off of any Pokemon..

16. Ayunnuya said on April 13, 2010, 05:18:01 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaredvcxz View Post
I think that there should be a crystal type. It's a fairly solid idea, since there can be many applications to crystal-type moves.


As for light: It's the perfect way to counter dark-type, but there would need to be a type that can overpower it, which I don't see happening.
Light type resembles normal type. Crystal is an awkward combination of rock and ice so I don't see the need for this type. We really don't need any new types.

They're not bad ideas though.

17. byt411 said on April 16, 2010, 04:09:40 PM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

But,Hey,There's gonna be new pokemon so..you never know what happens next.

18. Tangy said on April 16, 2010, 04:17:26 PM (-07:00)

Joltik
11 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by byt411 View Post
But,Hey,There's gonna be new pokemon so..you never know what happens next.
We've gone two generations with new Pokemon but no new types. I don't really see any need for new types. If they can think of one or two new good ideas that wouldn't mess up the type chart too much, I'm all for it, but none of those ideas I've seen make much sense.

19. Sunny said on April 16, 2010, 04:19:17 PM (-07:00)

Keldeo
1,136 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by LiteTheIronMan View Post
As I've said previously, Light-type should exist if only to counter Sableye and Spiritomb.
Sableyes horribly underpowered and the only thing keep spiritomb usable in UU is that it has no weaknesses. If it had a 4x weakness to a new type it would go waaaaaaaaay down too NU. .-.

20. Ayunnuya said on April 16, 2010, 08:52:59 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny View Post
Sableyes horribly underpowered and the only thing keep spiritomb usable in UU is that it has no weaknesses. If it had a 4x weakness to a new type it would go waaaaaaaaay down too NU. .-.
True, Sableye isn't a major threat.

Sorry, Sableyed.

21. The Spirit of Time said on April 17, 2010, 02:17:26 AM (-07:00)

Rayquaza
3,934 posts

If you think of it logically, Zorua/Zoroark should have been not dark if a new type was going to be introduced. I mean, they would have introduced the first Pokemon with a new type to let us think about it. I think that more combination will be given, like fire/water Pokemon, or something like that.

22. pokewalker1205 said on April 17, 2010, 12:00:44 PM (-07:00)

Servine
54 posts

NINTENDO shouldn't mess up the game just for a game title!

23. Quadcentruo said on April 17, 2010, 12:09:52 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreezeWarp View Post
-Light
-Plasma
-Wood [ex. Sudowoodo]
-Fish [ex. Magikarp or Goldeen]
-Bird (That was a beta type in Gen-1)
-Space [ex. Clefairy].
Light? Maybe....
Plasma? Why?
Wood? Extra pointless!
Fish? Weak to fishing rods obviously!
Bird? No. Just, no.
Space? Although cool sounding, only a few Pokemon will be in this type, if in game. (Clefairy family, Solrock, Lunatine... misspelled? Deoxys, Jirachi)

24. Alakazamaster said on April 17, 2010, 12:16:52 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,366 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by LiteTheIronMan View Post
As I've said previously, Light-type should exist if only to counter Sableye and Spiritomb. It would be balanced by being weak to Normal types, especially since Normal moves can't get type trump multipliers off of any Pokemon..
Weak to Poison too. Poison is only good against one thing and is thus rather awful offensively...

25. byt411 said on April 17, 2010, 01:33:27 PM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

Hey,Or maybe,make Poison weak to water as it dissolves.

26. Sableyed said on April 17, 2010, 02:30:14 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
999 posts

I say no to new types. the system works as it is.

27. byt411 said on April 18, 2010, 02:43:28 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

I'll tell you guys a thing.Now,Completing the DP Dex is easier than ever.with Platinum and HG + SS,Sooooo easy

28. Quadcentruo said on April 19, 2010, 12:32:17 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by byt411 View Post
Hey,Or maybe,make Poison weak to water as it dissolves.
Or make water weak to poison because of pollution

29. Ayunnuya said on April 19, 2010, 04:04:40 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by byt411 View Post
I'll tell you guys a thing.Now,Completing the DP Dex is easier than ever.with Platinum and HG + SS,Sooooo easy
Let's try to keep things related the topic. But, thanks for your comment.

30. Fly Guy 2 said on April 22, 2010, 08:51:45 PM (-07:00)

Charizard
148 posts

I think we need a new type. They're still kind of unbalanced. Maybe something weak to Bug or Posion. And something else good on Normal, Blissey and Snorlax need some balancing, especially Snorlax.

31. puckyou0012 said on April 23, 2010, 04:20:50 AM (-07:00)

Magikarp
4 posts

Light is a good idea

Space is a other good idea

Rainbow is a other good idea

and it be cool if there a ??? type

32. Sunny said on April 23, 2010, 09:09:36 AM (-07:00)

Keldeo
1,136 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Guy 2 View Post
And something else good on Normal, Blissey and Snorlax need some balancing, especially BLISSEY.
Fixed~!

But seriously, normal types are on the weak side.

Pokemon types that resist normal type attacks: Steel, rock

Types that normal types resist: NOOOOTHIIIING

Super effective types that hit normal hard:
Fighting

Pokemon that get hit by normal types hard:NOOOOOOOOOOOTHING!

Yea, as you can see normal type is on the weak side. And fighting types moves are INCREDIBLY common. Practically every pokemon can learn a strong fighting move now like Superpower, or close combat, and as of HG and SS almost every pokemon can learn low kick through move tutor, which brings strong walls like snorlax to its knees. Tis a grim world out there for normal types.

33. Nightshade Darkrai said on April 23, 2010, 03:30:17 PM (-07:00)

Floatzel
192 posts

I think adding a new type or two would be pretty neat, but I can't come up with anything that either doesn't sound absurd or isn't covered by the other types.

The only thing I've got is if they officially endorse a Pokemon with the Unknown Type (It's really annoying to say '???' in conversation)

I'm not sure what it could be strong against, but it would be nice to see something weak against Normal Type moves, like Lite suggested.

34. Quadcentruo said on April 23, 2010, 06:06:07 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightshade Darkrai View Post
I'm not sure what it could be strong against, but it would be nice to see something weak against Normal Type moves, like Lite suggested.
How about the ???-type has no weaknesses or resistances?
Every attack is normally effective.

35. pokewalker1205 said on April 23, 2010, 07:11:45 PM (-07:00)

Servine
54 posts

Maybe.....
Music
Sand
Knowledge?
Artilary!

36. Quadcentruo said on April 23, 2010, 07:27:00 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokewalker1205 View Post
Maybe.....
Music (No)
Sand (Ground type)
Knowledge? (Psychic type)
Artilary! (NO!!!)
Comments are in parenthesis.

37. byt411 said on April 24, 2010, 06:06:46 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

HEAVY Type and LIGHT Type.hehehe.But Water should be weak to ice due to ice freezing Water.

38. Quadcentruo said on April 24, 2010, 08:38:43 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by byt411 View Post
But Water should be weak to ice due to ice freezing Water.
That shouldn't be it.
IF (and its a big "If"), there is a weakness between ice and water, ice should be weak to water because its as if you just put an ice cube in a glass of water.

It melts over time.

39. Ayunnuya said on April 24, 2010, 06:04:16 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadcentruo View Post
That shouldn't be it.
IF (and its a big "If"), there is a weakness between ice and water, ice should be weak to water because its as if you just put an ice cube in a glass of water.

It melts over time.
YOu'd expect there to be a relationship between ice and water, yet, there are some ice types that arent water.

40. Ayunnuya said on April 24, 2010, 09:35:45 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Just curious, do you think we need a pure flying type? Tangela and Tangigrowth are pure grass types, but there are no pure flying types.

41. Quadcentruo said on April 25, 2010, 10:32:57 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayunnuya View Post
Just curious, do you think we need a pure flying type? Tangela and Tangigrowth are pure grass types, but there are no pure flying types.
Unless you count Arceus with the plate that makes it flying.

What about a fighting-flying type?
Fighting type is the only type that isn't part of flying yet.

42. Ayunnuya said on April 25, 2010, 12:01:39 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadcentruo View Post
Unless you count Arceus with the plate that makes it flying.

What about a fighting-flying type?
Fighting type is the only type that isn't part of flying yet.
cool concept. Does a normal-fighting sound weird?

Reply to Quad: is there a flying-psychic? I don't own fourth gen. and i'm a bit stupid today.

43. Quadcentruo said on April 26, 2010, 12:12:26 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayunnuya View Post
is there a flying-psychic? I don't own fourth gen. and i'm a bit stupid today.
Yes there is... I'm not sure what it is though...
*checks serebii.net*
Natu and Xatu are the only Psychic flying types.

And those arn't even fourth gen!
They are both 2nd gen! *Face palm*

44. Ayunnuya said on April 26, 2010, 01:46:19 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
794 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadcentruo View Post
Yes there is... I'm not sure what it is though...
*checks serebii.net*
Natu and Xatu are the only Psychic flying types.

And those arn't even fourth gen!
They are both 2nd gen! *Face palm*
I did the same.

45. RavenTheClaw said on April 27, 2010, 10:59:10 PM (-07:00)

Cyndaquil
27 posts

Normals need a type advantage... Besides being immune to Ghost... They have alot pf potential, but Nintendo made them purely average.

46. Justjack91 said on April 28, 2010, 03:10:31 AM (-07:00)

Zoroark
289 posts

Light. One Pokemon, the legendary, for Pokemon White.

Maybe a "Dusk" Pokemon to counter it in Pokemon Black.

Super-effective hits for Light/Shadow attacks on only each other, normal hits on other Pokemon.

Weaknesses are only to each other. Both have same stats so both can counter each other (all a matter of luck and how you train).

Nuff said.

47. Ningamer said on April 28, 2010, 08:49:10 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,415 posts

Plastic type!
Many weaknesses, and probably no strengths... so a bit like normal type.

48. dpphgss1 said on April 28, 2010, 12:54:12 PM (-07:00)

Magikarp
2 posts

when is Pokemon White Black Coming Out?

49. Quadcentruo said on April 28, 2010, 01:52:34 PM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ningamer View Post
Plastic type!
Many weaknesses, and probably no strengths... so a bit like normal type.
Umm... No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpphgss1 View Post
when is Pokemon White Black Coming Out?
I think its later this year. I could be (and probably am) wrong.

50. byt411 said on April 29, 2010, 09:17:50 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

"I think its later this year. I could be (and probably am) wrong" Autumn in Japan,supposed to be this year,and should be nearly about the time of HG/SS for us.

51. Zega said on May 3, 2010, 08:17:38 AM (-07:00)

Linoone
97 posts

When I was little I made my own types, like Spike, Rainbow and Space.

But no, I don't think they should add more types. It's probably going to ruin the series.

52. Pichu_theworld_ruler said on May 3, 2010, 11:50:53 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
45 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavenTheClaw View Post
Normals need a type advantage... Besides being immune to Ghost... They have alot pf potential, but Nintendo made them purely average.

Hence the name 'normal...'

That aside, I will need to agree with the people that say that there is no more need for another type. Besides, ideas such as 'fish' or 'bird' do not truly fit into the traditional form of the Pokemon 'types.' Note how the other Pokemon types are all elemental. Such as Water, Electric, Steel, etc. There are a couple debatable ones such as Psychic, Ghost, and Dark.

Fish and bird are classifications, not types. (Something you would see in a Pokedex entry.)

Thanks for the time,

-Pichu

53. Turtwig said on May 26, 2010, 05:50:22 PM (-07:00)

Haxorus
372 posts

I don't think there will be any new types.

54. LoPun said on June 2, 2010, 07:24:40 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
671 posts

It would be awesome if we get a shadow type.<3
I heard rumors (I think they're from PokeBeach) that Reshirom is part light type. I really hope its true, cuz' I really want a light type.;~;

55. HatchedGeneration said on June 3, 2010, 12:20:55 AM (-07:00)

Mudkip
37 posts

I think New Types is a bad idea :/ they have enough. maybe having 3 types

56. LoPun said on June 3, 2010, 07:40:07 PM (-07:00)

Regigigas
671 posts

We should have a cheeze type.

Fo' real. I'm serious guys.
It would be cool if we had a monster type, or a sound type, but I doubt it.DX

57. Searinox said on June 4, 2010, 04:58:50 AM (-07:00)

Zoroark
251 posts

I would really find it both unlikely and a bit stupid to have an extra type added. "Light", "Holy"... the spiritual counterpart of Dark is Normal. It doesn't have anything in it that opposes Dark, but it's fine the way it is. Arceus and Regigigas were great to see that there can be Normal legendaries too. I see no point in adding any extra types to the game.

58. Ningamer said on June 4, 2010, 05:35:04 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,415 posts

If any type is to be added to the game, it's Light type. It's still not likely, but it's there. Instead of that rivalling Dark, they would have to make another type, like Dusk (As Justjack said). The possibility of them adding two more types is low, however.

59. Madhound26 said on June 4, 2010, 06:20:57 AM (-07:00)

Servine
66 posts

Light is tHE oNLY type I can Think of, Maybe Plastic, MICHAEL JACKSON!! HE HE

60. LoPun said on June 4, 2010, 06:22:25 AM (-07:00)

Regigigas
671 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madhound26 View Post
Light is tHE oNLY type I can Think of, Maybe Plastic, MICHAEL JACKSON!! HE HE
We definitely need a MJ type.8O Maybe a joker type too, that's what I thought zoroark would be.
Yeah the only type that's like left is light type.XD They should totally do it, and it shall be the rival of dark type. Like light and shadow.<3

61. Madhound26 said on June 4, 2010, 06:24:39 AM (-07:00)

Servine
66 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny View Post
Fixed~!

But seriously, normal types are on the weak side.

Pokemon types that resist normal type attacks: Steel, rock

Types that normal types resist: NOOOOTHIIIING

Super effective types that hit normal hard:
Fighting

Pokemon that get hit by normal types hard:NOOOOOOOOOOOTHING!

Yea, as you can see normal type is on the weak side. And fighting types moves are INCREDIBLY common. Practically every pokemon can learn a strong fighting move now like Superpower, or close combat, and as of HG and SS almost every pokemon can learn low kick through move tutor, which brings strong walls like snorlax to its knees. Tis a grim world out there for normal types.
Normal Types Resist Ghost...

62. Sunny said on June 4, 2010, 10:56:03 AM (-07:00)

Keldeo
1,136 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madhound26 View Post
Normal Types Resist Ghost...
They have IMMUNITY to ghost. An immunity to a type of attack thats hardly ever used anymore? Whooooo....:V

63. Ningamer said on June 4, 2010, 10:58:42 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,415 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny View Post
They have IMMUNITY to ghost. An immunity to a type of attack thats hardly ever used anymore? Whooooo....:V
Ghost-type attacks still rawk... =P
I can't tell if something's ghost or dark by looking at it any more... :V

64. Quadcentruo said on June 6, 2010, 08:06:06 AM (-07:00)

Giratina
3,684 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ningamer View Post
I can't tell if something's ghost or dark by looking at it any more... :V
Cough: :darkrai:
Cough::giratina:

65. SuperAj3 said on June 7, 2010, 01:36:39 AM (-07:00)

Cyndaquil
25 posts

Instead of Flying type, Wind Type. It fits more Pokemon.

66. Mudkip27 said on June 7, 2010, 07:47:48 AM (-07:00)

Pikachu
5 posts

Crystal would be pretty cool. The only thing is, there might not be enough Pokemon in the category. If they make new types, add a few more Pokemon, too.

67. A'bom said on June 7, 2010, 11:49:41 AM (-07:00)

Volcarona
535 posts

I, personally would like to see the type "sound" introduced. Sure, it'd require a bit of work to re-balance the type chart, re-code the game to change some of the moves' and pokemons' types, but I think it be great. Off the top of my head, Exploud, Chimecho, Mr. Mime, and Jigglypuff are all candidates for the type. It would cut down on the obscene number of normal types in the game... a little.

68. Mudkip27 said on June 7, 2010, 12:06:45 PM (-07:00)

Pikachu
5 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by A'bom View Post
I, personally would like to see the type "sound" introduced. Sure, it'd require a bit of work to re-balance the type chart, re-code the game to change some of the moves' and pokemons' types, but I think it be great. Off the top of my head, Exploud, Chimecho, Mr. Mime, and Jigglypuff are all candidates for the type. It would cut down on the obscene number of normal types in the game... a little.
OH. MY. GOSH. That would be AWESOME! Also Whismur could be a candidate. The moves could be such as: Explode, Ring, Hoot, Scream, Screech, etc. Totally!

69. kakashidragon said on June 7, 2010, 12:27:30 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,045 posts

U figure at least 1 new type would be made, cause the move curse has a ???? type and they should fill in that ???? as a real type. That way arceus can have that last 18th plate that they made as a backup data in case that type was put on it.

70. Jason_Henge said on June 7, 2010, 05:36:57 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

You forget, Curse isn't the same for all Pokemon.

Curse lowers a user's stat by 1 and raises the Attack and Defense by 1. Except for Ghost Pokemon. When a Ghost Pokemon uses Curse, the opponent Pokemon suffers a Curse effect, which slowly eats away at HP after cutting the user's HP in half.

And a "Light" Pokemon is a little stupid. They entire reason the Dark type was made was to counter the non-stop power of Psychic. Sound would be interesting, but what are the pros and cons of the type?

71. Pichu_theworld_ruler said on June 7, 2010, 07:00:57 PM (-07:00)

Mudkip
45 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason_Henge View Post
Sound would be interesting, but what are the pros and cons of the type?
The same as Exploud, whismur, or loudred...

-Pichu

72. Jason_Henge said on June 7, 2010, 07:04:29 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

You misunderstand.

Example: Fire is weak against water, but strong against grass.
What will Sound be strong again? Weak again?

73. A'bom said on June 7, 2010, 08:49:55 PM (-07:00)

Volcarona
535 posts

Sound could be a dragon-esque type. You know, nothing's really weak to it, nothing's really resistant to it (dragon is weak to dragon and steel is resistant to dragon, but other than that, the type itself is pretty much a neutral-coverage type). What would the point of it be then? Nothing really, I suppose... other than if your pokemon knew a sound-type move you wouldn't need to worry about not being able to hit an opponent. That, and shock wave is an electric type move just because it has the word "shock" in it. Shock waves don't have anything to do with electricity. It's just something that irks me.

74. Pichu_theworld_ruler said on June 7, 2010, 08:56:41 PM (-07:00)

Mudkip
45 posts

I understand actually, I had very little time to write up what I was going to say.

Okay, so, first, I will answer your question. It would probably be strong against bug (those poor bug types), rock (see an exploud in a cave), Psychic (possibly for the same reason bug is super effective against psychic), and fighting. It would be 'not very effective' against steel (sound-proof rooms), Electrodes and voltorbs, Water, and ineffective against ground (Although ground already has one of those ineffective things, so it may only be not very effective).

Sound would be weak against ground, steel, and sound.

Now, to the second point I wanted to make. I personally think the current type set is quite effective and fine as it is. I am personally quite adamant about keeping the type set as it is.

I hope to not come across too negatively...

-Pichu

75. kakashidragon said on June 7, 2010, 09:50:50 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,045 posts

i like to see another non-weakness combonation like dark and ghost have if theres another non-weakness comonation i cant think of.

76. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 09:58:32 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by A'bom View Post
Sound could be a dragon-esque type. You know, nothing's really weak to it, nothing's really resistant to it (dragon is weak to dragon and steel is resistant to dragon, but other than that, the type itself is pretty much a neutral-coverage type). What would the point of it be then? Nothing really, I suppose... other than if your pokemon knew a sound-type move you wouldn't need to worry about not being able to hit an opponent. That, and shock wave is an electric type move just because it has the word "shock" in it. Shock waves don't have anything to do with electricity. It's just something that irks me.
Yeah... Dragon is very weak against Ice. Sound would be a nice type, but there's huge debate of strengths and weaknesses. And suggesting Sound would be Dragon-esque is a little too much. That'll put all the previously suggested Sound Pokemon (Whismur, Chimecho, etc.) would be bumped up a huge notch.

77. A'bom said on June 8, 2010, 10:20:11 AM (-07:00)

Volcarona
535 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason_Henge View Post
That'll put all the previously suggested Sound Pokemon (Whismur, Chimecho, etc.) would be bumped up a huge notch.
Would it really be so horrible to give chimecho a promotion ? How often do you see people running around screaming, "FEAR MAH CHIMECHO!"

78. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 10:22:38 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Sound is a keen weapon. The US army uses it sometimes to cripple opposing forces. And if you pop your eardrum, there's no repairing it. I would fear something like that.

79. OMGITSJAD said on June 8, 2010, 10:56:56 AM (-07:00)

Shaymin
2,490 posts

Yes, but what types would resist it/be strong against it?
Maybe Rock/Steel/Ground would resist it and Water would be strong against it.(Water vs. a Sound System = destroied sound system)

80. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 11:09:59 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

I'm trying to think, but Sound is tricky. Water does distort sound, but sound isn't really a thing to test on, like Fire or Water would be.

81. FLOATZEL fan said on June 8, 2010, 11:11:36 AM (-07:00)

Banned
1 post

doncha think there should be a robot type? like, for PORYGON and MEWTWO?

82. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 11:22:29 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Steel type? Already made.

83. A'bom said on June 8, 2010, 02:55:49 PM (-07:00)

Volcarona
535 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by OMGITSJAD View Post
Yes, but what types would resist it/be strong against it?
Maybe Rock/Steel/Ground would resist it and Water would be strong against it.(Water vs. a Sound System = destroied sound system)
I think the reason a sound system is destroyed by water is because of the circuitry (if you're talking about just dumping a bucket of water on a sound system). Maybe psychic could be weak to sound. Telepathy and telekinesis are things usually associated with deep concentration, and what's more irritating than constant, ear-splitting noise?

84. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 03:04:27 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by A'bom View Post
I think the reason a sound system is destroyed by water is because of the circuitry (if you're talking about just dumping a bucket of water on a sound system). Maybe psychic could be weak to sound. Telepathy and telekinesis are things usually associated with deep concentration, and what's more irritating than constant, ear-splitting noise?
Valid point. ^_^ Although it may power up Psyduck with a headache. XD

85. Alakazamaster said on June 8, 2010, 04:10:44 PM (-07:00)

Kyurem
2,366 posts

Hmmm Sound does seem like a good type with the logic of what it can beat and what it is weak to! But it would be kinda difficult to base a Pokemon off of sound... stuff like Grass and Rock is easy, but making a Pokemon that looks like sound seems kinda tricky.

86. Sunny said on June 8, 2010, 04:20:48 PM (-07:00)

Keldeo
1,136 posts

Well theres already a few in existence like chatot, kricketune and exploud that can be part "sound." It would probably just be a very little used type though.

87. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 04:30:57 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

I doubt Sound will be a real type, since it's just so confusing.

88. PokeRemixStudio said on June 8, 2010, 04:54:37 PM (-07:00)

Moderator
2,066 posts

A digital type. Porygon would fit in it for sure.

Oil type. It could have some balanced qualities. Weak against fire and strong against water, for example.

89. Jason_Henge said on June 8, 2010, 05:14:22 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Wouldn't Oil fall under Poison? Grimer and Muk, maybe? (Sludge, oil, same thing to me.)

It would bother me to see an Oil-type Pokemon in nature. It'll be hunted to death.

90. Mudkip27 said on June 11, 2010, 07:49:12 AM (-07:00)

Pikachu
5 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLOATZEL fan View Post
doncha think there should be a robot type? like, for PORYGON and MEWTWO?
Are you a mind reader? I have been thinking of a machine type. Such as Bronzong. Water would short it, being super effective on it. Electricity could power it, giving it HP. Fire could melt it, being super effective on it.

91. Jason_Henge said on June 11, 2010, 08:57:40 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Why do we need a Machine-type when we have Steel-type? That's like suggesting a Flower-type even when we have a Grass-type.

92. Mudkip27 said on June 11, 2010, 09:34:43 AM (-07:00)

Pikachu
5 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadcentruo View Post
Yes there is... I'm not sure what it is though...
*checks serebii.net*
Natu and Xatu are the only Psychic flying types.

And those arn't even fourth gen!
They are both 2nd gen! *Face palm*
AHEM. LUGIA?

93. Jason_Henge said on June 11, 2010, 09:39:14 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Lugia is weird. It's Psychic/Flying... but lives in the ocean? I'm confused.

94. Mudkip27 said on June 11, 2010, 09:42:23 AM (-07:00)

Pikachu
5 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason_Henge View Post
Lugia is weird. It's Psychic/Flying... but lives in the ocean? I'm confused.
Yeah, and half of the moves it knows are water-type! I say it should be Water/Flying but it's not.

95. Jason_Henge said on June 11, 2010, 09:45:10 AM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Haha. Poor Lugia. It's so confused. I guess back then Dragon and Psychic types were like the best types.

96. Twilightwing said on June 11, 2010, 08:09:51 PM (-07:00)

Joltik
12 posts

I think the two best canidates are sound and light.

Light moves are effective against: Dark, Ghost,
Light moves are not effective against: Water, Grass
Light types resist: Dark, Ghost, Psychic
Light types are weak against: Grass, Water

Sound moves are effective against: Rock, Ice, Psychic, Dark
Sound moves are not effective against: Steel, Water
Sound types resist: I really can't think of anything
Sound types are weak against: Water, Steel

I hope this helps a little ^_^

97. Jason_Henge said on June 11, 2010, 08:50:44 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilightwing View Post
I think the two best canidates are sound and light.

Light moves are effective against: Dark, Ghost,
Light moves are not effective against: Water, Grass
Light types resist: Dark, Ghost, Psychic
Light types are weak against: Grass, Water

Sound moves are effective against: Rock, Ice, Psychic, Dark
Sound moves are not effective against: Steel, Water
Sound types resist: I really can't think of anything
Sound types are weak against: Water, Steel

I hope this helps a little ^_^
Helps some. ^_^ IMO, Light = Psychic.

98. Twilightwing said on June 12, 2010, 01:04:10 PM (-07:00)

Joltik
12 posts

They should be the same type IMO XD

99. Jason_Henge said on June 12, 2010, 01:15:04 PM (-07:00)

Celebi
1,269 posts

I think that's what they were going for, but since Psychic is better to personate, they went with Psychic types. Light could be personated... but it'll be more religious than anything, and that's not cool, unless they have a religion based around Arceus. =3

100. Twilightwing said on June 12, 2010, 02:04:36 PM (-07:00)

Joltik
12 posts

I don't like arceus, though mostly because everyone overhypes him XD. Poor Mewtwo, his days in the spot light have died T_T

Got a bit off topic XD

Limit reached

As of now, there is a limit of 100 posts per page.

Page 1 of 212>

User List - Contact - Privacy Statement - Lycanroc.Net