You are viewing an archive of Victory Road.
Victory Road closed on January 8, 2018. Thank you for making us a part of your lives since 2006! Please read this thread for details if you missed it.
I'll have to make do with MP3s at around 256 kbps, because that will work well across all devices, sound good enough (It's above 192 kbps by a healthy margin and is can't be distinguished with 320 or CD), its tags can be read easily by most programs, and MP3Gain (with Unicode support) works with it very well. It's also isn't as costly as 320 kbps MP3s on my puny SSD.
What's your preferred audio format?
1 – GTP_NickSkylineMy personal favorite audio format is MP3. The file size is not overbearing and it has decent quality if the audio is rendered correctly. The comments/tags/etc. also work nicely with most to all portable audio playing devices, like Twiggy said before me here. However, MP3 is a compressed audio format, similar to how Youtube Super-Compresses the video files uploaded to it's site, just not as strong obviously. To Audiogeeks/Audiophiles me, we can detect these differences usually but it's nothing to cry over. I shall include a quick demonstration here.
|
I'll have to make do with MP3s at around 256 kbps, because that will work well across all devices, sound good enough (It's above 192 kbps by a healthy margin and is can't be distinguished with 320 or CD), its tags can be read easily by most programs, and MP3Gain (with Unicode support) works with it very well. It's also isn't as costly as 320 kbps MP3s on my puny SSD.
|
1 – Cat333PokémonMy personal archival of remixes is always in WAV at the same sampling rate as the recording, never anything else. I distribute them in original WAV for the audiophiles as well as MP3 at 256 kbps (encoded with lame) for a good balance of quality, size, and compatibility.
However, I hate MP3 for any personal purposes. It's so outdated and sounds very poor. I've got really sensitive ears to artifcats, and I can hear them on most MP3 files under 216 kbps. Hey, at least we're not all using MP2; it's even worse.
For ripping CDs and standard transfer of audio to media players, I prefer WMA Pro at 192 kbps, with WMA Standard at 192 kbps as fallback.
AAC/M4A is the format I prefer for the soundtrack in my videos, as well as for transfer of media to the 3DS or other devices that don't support WMA.
MP3 is all of my music library. I have heard MP3 is low-quality music which fooled ears enough to be enjoyable. Or, it is "The more you know about graphics, the less you know about sound.". I've also heard there exists another format that compresses better than MP3 and my iPod can use it, but I'm not ready to convert it.
Just to annoy cat fla format.
Rencoded in http://www.speex.org/
1 – Cat333PokémonI've always wondered about the practicality of lossless audio these days. If you can't hear the difference between a well-encoded 192k and the original, I think it might be a good point to just call it a day and go with just one step higher - 256k. Likewise, if you can hear something wrong with 192k, but not with 256, then feel free to use 320. Diminishing returns, though - the difference is extremely noticeable from anything below 128k to 128k, and then again from 128k to 192k for most standard codecs. Advanced codecs such as HE-AAC, WMAP, MP3P will be <64k - 64k - 128k.
Oh, and by the way, files compressed using these lossless audio codecs aren't bound by WAV container limits. Speaking of WAV, since it's just a container format, it's entirely possible that it can contain compressed audio, like ADPCM, for example. (quarters file size of a 16-bit LPCM audio stream, at the cost of possible clipping at high frequencies)
At one point I had an EP by Xanopticon (The Silver Key) on my hard drive that was in FLAC. 3 songs, 20 minutes, 160 megabytes. Bullcrap. The songs weren't even that great. I'll settle for MP3 160 kbps to 360 kbps.
Also, I'm moving this to a more appropriate forum. We're not necessarily talking about making music.
2 – Cat333Pokémon, Twiggy|
Oh, and by the way, files compressed using these lossless audio codecs aren't bound by WAV container limits. Speaking of WAV, since it's just a container format, it's entirely possible that it can contain compressed audio, like ADPCM, for example. (quarters file size of a 16-bit LPCM audio stream, at the cost of possible clipping at high frequencies)
|
|
At one point I had an EP by Xanopticon (The Silver Key) on my hard drive that was in FLAC. 3 songs, 20 minutes, 160 megabytes. Bullcrap. The songs weren't even that great. I'll settle for MP3 160 kbps to 360 kbps.
Also, I'm moving this to a more appropriate forum. We're not necessarily talking about making music. |
|
Originally Posted by Forum description
Discussion and bragging about music, composition, and other forms of audio
|