You are viewing an archive of Victory Road.
Victory Road closed on January 8, 2018. Thank you for making us a part of your lives since 2006! Please read this thread for details if you missed it.
So now it's basically down to Ron Paul, Newt "Globalist" Gingrich, and I think Romney(although I don't really give a rat's buttox who else is there but Ron Paul).
Who do you guys prefer to win? I'm going for Ron Paul because he's the only one up there that isn't a Globalist hog who wants World Government, and someone who actually wants us out of war.
Hopefully he won't be like Obama who repeated the same slogans like "Yes we can" over and over again to ratify everyone. I actually thought the man was the Anti Christ for awhile because he knows how to talk to the public and decieve everyone. People thought he was going to ACTUALLY change the world, depicting him as Superman lol.
Anyway, ranting aside. Ron Paul is the number 1 man under the sun. Too bad the Media ignores him, labeling him as an "extremist" lol. Ron Paul is a threat to the Military Industrial Complex--that Eisenhower warned about. And with great reason.
1 – piexing|
Originally Posted by tysonrss
Ron Paul is the number 1 man under the sun. Too bad the Media ignores him, labeling him as an "extremist" lol. Ron Paul is a threat to the Military Industrial Complex--that Eisenhower warned about. And with great reason.
|
|
Ron Paul is a wolf in sheep's clothing: a libertarian parading around as a conservative. Unable to win with a third party ticket, he picked one of the two ( which makes it funnier when people claim he's not a part of the two-party system ). Claiming the United States brought 9/11 onto itself not only shows he is an extremist, but has a dangerous naivete when it comes to foreign policy. It's as if though he lives in a world where the United States is perfectly defended by two oceans against attacks and slept through the Cold War. The only props I can give to the man is that his message ( which I can agree with on parts as Keynesian economic theory is just silly ) has been consistent since he's been saying the same thing since the 80's, but he's a huge hypocrite. Ron Paul's added earmarks ( pork as he'd call it ) as anyone else has, but shouts against it out of the other side of his mouth. His heart may by in the right place, but I could not vote for the man.
Everyone seems to have collective amnesia that Newt Gingrich was the Speaker of the House the last time the United States had a balanced budget ( during the Clinton administration of all things, dragging slick Willy kicking and screaming - for welfare reform ). Jon Huntsman seems like a fair choice, too. |